Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Discov Today. 2017 Aug 3;22(12):1782–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.07.013

Table 1.

Interactions of representative adenosine derivatives with receptors and transporters. This simplified table indicates the typical contributions of each structural feature to the overall affinity of these nucleosides at the indicated target, with the beneficial gain in binding affinity indicated as +++ > ++ > + > −. Values were determined from several examples and are not necessarily general to all examples.

graphic file with name nihms897546u1.jpg
Structural feature hA1AR hA3AR mA3AR h5HT2B/2C hDAT hNET
References: 62, 35, 72 62, 35, 72 62 58, 62 35, 72 35, 72
Ribose modifications (A vs. B), R1 at 5′
A (N)-methanocarba +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +
5′-CONHCH3 +++ +++ +++ ++ +++ +
5′-COOMe or 5′-COOEt ++ ++a ++ +++ +
5′-COOPr ND ++ + + +++
5′-COO-i-Pr ND + + (2C)
5′-COOH ND + + +
5′-CONH-(CH2)2-NH2 + +
4′-truncated + ++a + + ND
B 9-riboside (CH2OH) +++ ++ + ++ ++ +
Adenine modifications: R2 at C2; R3 at N6
C2-Cl +++ +++ +++ ++
C2-C≡C-(5-Cl-thien-2-yl) +++ ++ + +++ +
N6-Me ++ +++ ++ + +++ +
N6-Pr ++ +++ ++ ND ++
N6-CH(cPr)2 +++ ++ ND +++
N6-CH2Ph ++ +++ +++ ++
N6-(Me)2 + + ++
1-deaza +++ +++ ++ +

ND, not determined.

a

reduces agonist efficacy.