Table 1.

Comparison of pairs of population data with different reverberation types.

	Constant room condition			Varying room condition
	Reverb.(room #1)	Reverb.(room #2)	Reverb.(room #3)	Reverb.(room #1)	Reverb.(room #2)	Reverb.(room #3)
Non- reverb.	0.154;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]	0.151;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]	0.164;0.94;[0.92, 0.95]	0.161;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]	0.160;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]	0.161;0.95;[0.93, 0.95]
Reverb. (room #1)	—	0.146;0.96;[0.95, 0.97]	0.151;0.96;[0.94, 0.96]	—	0.137;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]	0.142;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]
Reverb. (room #2)	—	—	0.146;0.96;[0.95, 0.97]	—	—	0.128;0.95;[0.94, 0.96]

Separated by semicolons in each cell: Hellinger distance, correlation coefficient, and 99% bootstrap confidence intervals of the correlation coefficient.