Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 8;76(11):1924–1930. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211351

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of at-risk individuals in the validation cohort

At-risk individuals no arthritis developed (n=35) At-risk individuals arthritis developed (n=15)
Female sex, n (%) 22 (63) 8 (53)
Age, years, median (IQR) 51 (43–55) 47 (37–52)
IgM-RF positive, n (%) 28 (80) 11 (73)
Level low positive, n (%)*† 20 (57) 7 (64)
Level high positive, n (%)*† 15 (43) 4 (36)
ACPA positive, n (%) 20 (57) 14 (93)
Level, median (IQR)*‡ 1333 (364–9650) 342 (155–1016)
IgM-RF/ACPA double positive, n (%) 13 (37) 10 (67)
ESR, median (IQR)§ 12 (4–18) 10 (3–19)
CRP, median (IQR)¶ 2.4 (0.9–4.5) 2.3 (1.1–9.4)
53TJC, median (IQR) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–1)
Risk rule model**
Low risk, n (%) 17 (49%) 0 (0%)
Intermediate risk, n (%) 14 (40%) 6 (40%)
High risk, n (%) 4 (11%) 9 (60%)

Positive IgM-RF: >12.5 kU/L.

Positive anti-CCP2 >25 kAU/L.

*Only in individuals who were positive.

†Levels were categorised into high/low positive according to cut-off levels used in the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis because of changed reference values over time.

‡Measured in kAU/L.

§Measured in mm/hour.

¶Measured in mg/L.

**Score based on the risk rule24 scaled 0–13 points.

ACPA, anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (using anti-CCP2 test); CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IgM-RF, rheumatoid factor of the IgM isotype; 53TJC, tender joint count assessed in 53 joints.