Table 1.
Sample (n = 481) | ENERGY DRINK USE
|
F- or χ2 (p = ) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
None (n = 243) | Not w Alcohol (n = 88) | With Alcohol (n = 150) | |||
Years Age | 21.3 (± 2.07) | 21.5 (± 2.10)a | 21.1 (± 2.17) | 20.9 (± 1.91) | 5.04 (.010) |
Gender (Male) | 231 (48.0%) | 99 (40.7%)a | 48 (54.6%) | 84 (56.0%) | 10.49 (.005) |
Non-Latino White | 317 (65.9%) | 144 (59.3%)a | 62 (70.5%) | 111 (74.0%) | 9.96 (.007) |
School Status | |||||
Full-Time | 236 (49.1%) | 106 (43.6%) | 51 (58.0%) | 79 (52.7%) | 6.51 (.164) |
Part-Time | 58 (12.1%) | 33 (13.6%) | 9 (10.2%) | 16 (10.7%) | |
Not In School | 187 (38.9%) | 104 (42.8%) | 28 (31.8%) | 55 (36.7%) | |
Age First Used Alcohol | 15.6 (± 2.32) | 16.0 (± 2.28)a | 15.6 (± 2.39) | 15.0 (± 2.20) | 8.78 (<.001) |
Days Alcohol Use / 30 | 7.88 (± 5.49) | 7.51 (± 5.56)a | 6.51 (± 5.32)b | 9.27 (± 5.21) | 8.30 (<.001) |
Days Binged / 30 | 3.79 (± 4.15) | 3.00 (± 3.74)a | 3.11 (± 3.84)b | 5.47 (± 4.48) | 17.22 (<.001) |
SIP | 6.30 (± 6.26) | 5.81 (± 5.98)a | 4.49 (± 4.38)b | 8.15 (± 7.16) | 11.42 (<.001) |
DSM-V AUD Severityc | |||||
No Disorder | 280 (58.2%) | 157 (64.6%)a | 60 (68.2%)b | 63 (42.0%) | |
Mild Disorder | 105 (21.8%) | 45 (18.5%) | 19 (21.6%) | 41 (27.3%) | 31.09 (<.001) |
Moderate Disorder | 68 (14.1%) | 25 (10.3%) | 9 (10.2%) | 34 (22.7%) | |
Severe Disorder | 28 (5.8%) | 16 (6.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (8.0%) |
SIP = Short Inventory of Problems; AUD = Alcohol Use Disorder
No energy drink use significantly (p < .05) different than concurrent energy drink use with alcohol, based on Holm-Bonferroni corrected p-value.
Energy drink alone significantly (p < .05) different than concurrent energy drink use with alcohol, based on Holm-Bonferroni corrected p-value.
P-values for pairwise between group comparisons on alcohol use disorder severity were estimated by ordered logistic regression.