Table 3.
Model for diabetic patients | Factors | RD | LL | UL | NNT | LL | UL |
ATE | RAAS1 vs non-RAAS | 0.030 | −0.012 | 0.072 | 32.9 | −12.6 | 78.5 |
RAAS2 vs non-RAAS | −0.052 | −0.069 | −0.035 | −19.1 | −25.5 | −12.9 | |
Risk | LL | UL | RR | LL | UL | ||
POM | Non-RAAS | 0.196 | 0.187 | 0.204 | |||
RAAS1 | 0.227 | 0.186 | 0.268 | 1.155 | 0.939 | 1.369 | |
RAAS2 | 0.144 | 0.129 | 0.159 | 0.773 | 0.652 | 0.815 | |
Model for non-diabetic patients | Factors | RD | LL | UL | NNT | LL | UL |
ATE | RAAS1 vs non-RAAS | −0.009 | −0.066 | 0.048 | −113.6 | −848.7 | 621.5 |
RAAS2 vs non-RAAS | −0.064 | −0.099 | −0.029 | −15.6 | −24.2 | −7.1 | |
Risk | LL | UL | RR | LL | UL | ||
POM | Non-RAAS | 0.223 | 0.215 | 0.229 | |||
RAAS1 | 0.224 | 0.157 | 0.270 | 0.960 | 0.705 | 1.216 | |
RAAS2 | 0.159 | 0.124 | 0.193 | 0.713 | 0.557 | 0.868 |
ATE Average treatment effect, LL Lower limit, POM Potential outcome mean, RAAS1 Duration use of 0.25–1 year, RAAS2 Duration use of >1 year, RD Risk difference, RR Rate ratio, UL Upper limit