Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 24;8(55):93567–93579. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20510

Table 4. Association between primary tumor sidedness and clinicopathological characteristics in 49 patients with anti-EGFR therapy in addition to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Primary tumor sidedness P-value
Variable Right (n = 8) Left (n = 41)
Age (years)
 < 65 4 27 0.443
 ≥ 65 4 14
Sex
 Male 4 27 0.443
 Female 4 14
Tumor size (mm)
 < 50 5 19 0.463
 ≥ 50 3 22
T category
 T2, 3 4 18 0.999
 T4 4 23
Histopathological grading
 G1, 2 3 32 0.033
 G3 5 9
Lymphatic invasion
 Absence 1 14 0.406
 Presence 7 27
Venous invasion
 Absence 2 6 0.601
 Presence 6 35
N category
 N0 1 5 0.999
 N1, 2 7 36
M category
 M0 1 1 0.421
 M1a 4 23
 M1b 3 17
KRAS status
 Wild-type 7 39 0.421
 Mutant 1 2
BRAF status
 Wild-type 5 38 0.047
 Mutant 3 3
Alterations in TK receptors/RAS pathway/PI3K pathway excluding KRAS and BRAF mutations
 Absence 7 20 0.059
 Presence 1 21
Alterations in TK receptors/RAS pathway/PI3K pathway
 0 3 15 0.492
 1 5 20
 2 0 6
 All wild-type 3 15 0.999
 Mutant-type 5 26
Anti-EGFR drug
 Cetuximab 2 9 0.999
 Panitumumab 6 32
Anti-EGFR therapy
 Initial therapy 3 9 0.386
 Subsequent therapy 5 32
Chemotherapy added to anti-EGFR therapy
 Oxaliplatin-based 3 7 0.195
 Irinotecan-based 3 29
 Anti-EGFR drug only 2 5