Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 3;8(56):96384–96395. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21466

Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the prognostic significance of soluble MICA/B.

Number of studies Number of patients HR 95%CI Overall effectP-value Subgroup differences P-value I2
Cancer type 0.47
 Melanoma 5 628 1.52 (1.23–1.88) < 0.0001 49%
 OSCC 2 173 2.65 (1.02–6.84) 0.04 0%
 Digestive system cancers 5 377 1.70 (1.35–2.13) < 0.00001 58%
ELISA 0.09
 sMICA 11 1297 1.60 (1.37–1.87) < 0.00001 47%
 sMICB 2 185 2.86 (1.49–5.51) 0.002 0%
Multivariate correction 0.48
 Yes 7 736 1.59 (1.32–1.92) < 0.00001 58%
 No 6 746 1.78 (1.38–2.28) < 0.00001 28%
Sample size 5 0.79
 ≤ 100 5 342 1.70 (1.33–2.17) < 0.0001 44%
 > 100 8 1140 1.63 (1.34–1.97) < 0.00001 52%