Table 1. Theoretical vs. experimental CD responses ^a .

Condition	λ/nm	106 ΔA/A
		Calc.	Expt
LCP 355 d	316 b	–37	–38
	418 c	+44	+34
PP 355	316 b	–28	–26
LCP 532 d	418 c	+24	+21
RCP 355	316 b	–72	–62
LCP 532 e	418 c	+61	+56

^aMeasured and predicted ΔA/A from the TDDFT g-factors (see ESI, Section S7.4).

^bΔA₃₁₆/A₃₁₆ is read from Fig. 5 and scaled according to the ratio of extinction coefficients at 418 nm and 316 nm from Fig. 4.

^cThe experimental ΔA₄₁₈/A₄₁₈ at 418 nm is read directly from Fig. 5.

^dMagnitude determined from the average absolute value for RCP and LCP in Fig. 5a.

^eDetermined directly from Fig. 5b.