Table 5.

Effect of frequency of hunger training on intuitive eating using the IES-2 questionnaire.

Variable	n	Frequency Days	Month 0 Mean (SD)	Month 6 Mean (SD)	Difference 1 Mean (95% CI)
Overall Score	13	0–29	3.03 (0.48)	2.93 (0.55)
	6	30–59	3.02 (0.52)	3.06 (0.33)	0.09 (−0.50, 0.67)
	15	≥60	3.06 (0.49)	3.37 (0.41)	0.37 (−0.08, 0.82)
Body-food choice congruence	13	0–29	3.38 (0.78)	3.19 (0.88)
	6	30–59	3.22 (0.34)	3.17 (0.94)	0.29 (−0.52, 1.11)
	15	≥60	3.40 (0.71)	3.89 (0.80)	0.73 (0.12, 1.35)
Unconditional permission to eat	13	0–29	3.24 (0.69)	3.38 (0.61)
	6	30–59	3.42 (0.38)	2.94 (0.61)	−0.75 (−1.53, 0.04)
	15	≥60	3.37 (0.54)	2.87 (0.65)	−0.68 (−1.28, −0.09)
Reliance on hunger and satiety cues	13	0–29	2.78 (0.81)	2.69 (0.87)
	6	30–59	2.98 (0.75)	2.92 (0.35)	−0.06 (−1.13, 1.00)
	15	≥60	2.78 (0.67)	3.44 (0.78)	0.68 (−0.13, 1.49)
Eating for physical rather than emotional reasons	13	0–29	2.92 (0.89)	2.69 (1.02)
	6	30–59	2.67 (0.97)	3.21 (0.40)	0.74 (−0.22, 1.70)
	15	≥60	2.91 (0.84)	3.50 (0.75)	0.79 (0.06, 1.51)

¹ Difference refers to frequency group relative to 0–29 days (reference group). Adjusted for sex and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Westfall method.