Fig. 4.
CEST signal in the scar (0.09 ± 0.02) is significantly reduced compared to healthy remote myocardium (0.16 ± 0.02), p < 0.001. CEST signal in the border zone (0.12 ± 0.02) was also reduced compared to remote myocardium, p < 0.001
CEST signal in the scar (0.09 ± 0.02) is significantly reduced compared to healthy remote myocardium (0.16 ± 0.02), p < 0.001. CEST signal in the border zone (0.12 ± 0.02) was also reduced compared to remote myocardium, p < 0.001