Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;14(11):1288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111288

Table 5.

Summary of findings on enablers and barriers to progression of equity by SA HiAP.

Key Elements of Institutional Theory Enablers Barriers
Ideas
  • -

    Equity accepted by policy actors as legitimate public policy concern

  • Statement on the importance of equity evident in policy documents

  • -

    Dominance of economic priorities over social policy ideas

  • ‘Trickle down’ economic benefits expected to address equity without further action

  • Equity not seen as core business

  • Equity evident in some policy statements but shift to concrete focus on lifestyle/individual behaviour in strategies

  • Lack of shared understanding of equity

Actors
  • -

    Policy actors have value base supportive of equity

  • Policy actors feel able to act on policy statements concerning equity

  • -

    Lack of political will to deal with fundamental social structural issues

  • Policy actors operate within constraints of government institutional priorities

  • Focus on social determinants of health in intersectoral policy, with equity remaining implicit and invisible

  • Co-benefits prioritise partner agencies’ agendas over health agenda

Institutions
  • -

    SASP provided initial mandate and focus for SA HiAP and included some equity focus

  • Government intersectoral policy agenda driving public sector focus on complex problems (potential for this to include equity)

  • -

    Neo-liberalism an overarching meta-institution

  • Shift in government priority setting documents away from equity

  • Siloed framing of agency core business

  • Process focus on intersectoral collaboration preferenced over outcome focus on equity