Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Dec;4(12):e923–e935. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30259-5

Table 2.

Sources of between-population heterogeneity in the percentage of late-stage breast cancer (stages III/IV) from meta-regression analyses

Patients with breast cancer, n All study populations
Black populations only
Unadjusted analysis
Region and race adjusted analysis
Fully-adjusted analysis*
Unadjusted analysis
Fully-adjusted analysis
AD (%) 95% Cl AD (%) 95% Cl AD (%) 95% Cl AD (%) 95% Cl AD (%) 95% Cl
Region, race

West Africa, black 10845     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)
East Africa, black 3186   −0.2   −6.8 to 6.4   −3.0   −9.2 to 3.2   −0.2   −6.6 to 6.3   −3.3   −9.5 to 2.9
Southern Africa, black 2638     0.1   −9.0 to 9.3     8.6   −2.0 to 19.1     0.1   −8.9 to 9.1     5.8   −5.9 to 17.5
Southern Africa, non-black 7544 −25.5 −32.6 to −18.3 −18.1 −28.2 to −8.0

Study design

Convenience case series 14425     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)
Consecutive case series 9788   −6.5 −12.9 to −0.4   −0.6   −6.1 to 4.9   −2.0   −7.1 to 3.1   −2.2   −7.9 to 3.6   −2.6   −8.0 to 2.8

Study population

Urban 14208 0 (ref) 0 (ref) 0 (ref) 0 (ref) 0 (ref)
Mixed (rural and urban) 10 005 16.3 10.6 to 22.0 10.7 3.4 to 17.9 12.9 5.5 to 20·3 7.7 1.7 to 13.7 13.2 5.7 to 20.7

Facility type

Tertiary 22399     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)     0 (ref)
Tertiary, secondary, or primary 1503   −3.7 −13.2 to 5.8   −1.2   −8.8 to 6.4   −1.9   −9.1 to 5.4   −3.2 −11.5 to 5.1   −1.4   −9.5 to 6.6
Not reported in original study 311   −8.8 −30.5 to 12.9 14.8   −3.4 to 32.9 10.1   −0.8 to 28.3

Age at diagnosis (years)§

<45 years 4840   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)
>45 to <50 years 7218     0.8   −6.0 to 7.8     0.3   −5.5 to 6.0     3.9   −2.0 to 9.9   −0.3   −6.2 to 5.6     3.9   −2.3 to 10.1)
>50 years 9841 −13.2 −21.2 to −5.3   −6.2 −14.4 to 2.0   −1.7   −9.9 to 6.4   −3.9 −12.0 to 4.1     1.8   −8.9 to 12.4
Not reported in original study 2314 12.0   −4.4 to 28.5 17.4     3.8 to 31.1 20.6     6.4 to 34.8 14.6   −1.3 to 30.6 20.4     4.8 to 36.1

Year of diagnosis

Before 1980 3782   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)
1980–1999 10737   4.8   −4.3 to 13.9   −3.0 −10.6 to 4.6   −5.2 −12.6 to 2.2   −4.7 −13.1 to 3.7   −6.8 −15.5 to 1.9
2000 or after 6733   4.3   −5.0 to 13.5   −6.2 −14.2 to 1.8   −8.5 −16.1 to −1.0   −8.4 −16.8 to −0.1 −10.5 −19.3 to −1.5
Not reported in original study 2961   −6.5 −19.9 to 6.9   −7.3 −18.2 to 3.6   −8.5 −19.0 to 2.1 −16.5 −29.7 to −3.3 −12.5 −25.9 to 1.8

Staging methods

Clinical and imaging 9516   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)   0 (ref)
Clinical only 967   5.0   −6.4 to 16.4   2.3   −7.0 to 11.6   −1.4 −10.4 to 7.6   3.0   −5.9 to 11.9   −1.3 −10.3 to 7.8
Not reported in original study 13730   0.2   −7.1 to 7.4   3.0   2.7 to 8.8   3.2   −2.3 to 8.7   4.0   −1.9 to 10.0   4.1   −1.7 to 9.8

Staging classification

TNM 18048   0 (ref)   0 (ref)
Manchester 1426   2.4   −7.6 to 12.5   −3.7 −12.1 to 4.6
Not reported in original study 4739   3.1   −4.5 to 10.7   −0.8   −7.0 to 5.5

Study quality scores

>23 (highest quality) 3569   0 (ref)   0 (ref)
22–20 5721   −2.1 −12.7 to 8.5   −0.1   −8.5 to 8.3
19–17 13327   −1.1 −11.2 to 9.0     2.1   −5.9 to 10.1
<17 (lowest quality) 1596   0.7 −11.5 to 12.9   2.9   −6.9 to 12.6

Data are n, absolute difference (%), or 95% Cl. Ref= reference category. AD=absolute difference. TNM=Tumour, Lymph Node, and Metastasis staging system.

*

Adjusted for all other variables, except for staging classification and study quality because of concerns of overadjustment,

Adjusted for all other variables, except region or race, staging classification, and study quality.

The study population was classified as black if 80% of participants or more were black (appendix p 14, figure 3).

§

Mean or median age at breast cancer diagnosis. If only age categories were reported mean or median age was estimated from the mid-point and the reported number in each age category.

Taken as the middle year of the period during which patient recruitment took place.

Categories defined using quartiles of the overall score distribution. Analyses were not further adjusted for the other variables in the table because most of them were integrated into the study quality scores (appendix p 9).