Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0187573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187573

Table 4. Frequencies of determinants of food choice, reasons to eat or not to eat, state after the meal and median (p25–p75) of hunger and food satisfaction scales of women with breast cancer (BC) in chemotherapy (CT) (n = 23).

Variable T0 T1 T2 p-value
n % or Median
(p25–p75)
n % or Median
(p25–p75)
n % or Median
(p25 –p75)
Determinants of food choice
Appetite 4 17.39 2 08.69 0 00.00 0.055
Food habit 3 13.04 5 21.73 1 04.34 0.180
Available time 4 17.39 4 17.39 2 08.69 0.641
Available Food 7 30.43 11 47.82 10 43.47 0.522
Taste 9 39.13 7 30.43 12 52.17 0.368
Reasons to eat
Always eat at this time 8 34.78 4 17.39 7 30.43 0.307
Hunger 6 26.08 10 43.47 8 34.78 0.397
Follow friends/Family 1 04.34 2 08.69 0 00.00 0.368
Friends/family request 1 04.34 0 00.00 0 00.00 0.368
Follow medical/nutritional guidance 3 13.04 5 21.73 5 21.73 0.607
Because they offered 4 17.39 3 13.04 5 21.73 0.741
Reasons not to eat
Do not eat at this time 0 00.00 0 00.00 1 04.34 0.368
Reduced apetite 1 04.34 1 04.34 0 00.00 0.607
I had nothing to eat 1 04.34 0 00.00 0 00.00 0.368
I didn’t like what I had to eat 1 04.34 0 00.00 0 00.00 0.368
Nausea 0 00.00 2 08.69 1 04.34 0.223
The smell bothers me 0 00.00 1 04.34 0 00.00 0.368
Severe pain 1 04.34 0 00.00 0 00.00 0.368
State after the meal
Still hungry 3 13.04 2 08.69 5 21.73 0.368
Satisfied 18 78.26 17 73.91 13 56.52 0.174
Stuffed 2 08.69 1 04.34 1 04.34 0.779
Nauseated 0 00.00 2 08.69 4 17.39 0.091
With “burning” in the stomach 1 04.34 1 04.34 0 00.00 0.607
Hunger
23
5.0
(2.0–5.0)

23
5.0
(3.0–8.0)

23
5.0
(2.0–6.0)
0.113
Meal enjoyment
23
9.0a
(7.0–10.0)

23
6.0b
(5.0–10.0)

23
9.0a
(8.0–10.0)
0.021

T0, day of the first cycle of CT infusion; T1, day of the intermediate cycle of CT infusion and T2, day of the last cycle of CT infusion. Frequencies horizontally followed by different letters differ statistically, as post-hoc test at 5% probability (Cochran's Q test + McNemar’s post hoc).

† Friedman test + Dunn’s post-hoc; n = 23 because 32 women do not eat during the hospital stay, making it impracticable compare the individual with him/herself. Subjects were allowed to choose more than one option for each question. To evaluate hunger and meal enjoyment, a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 to 10 cm) was used.