Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul 5;165(3):601–609. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4375-5

Table 3.

Adverse events of clinical interest

Adverse event R/D/E R/E Difference in percentage vs. R/E
n (%) n = 39 n = 40 Estimate (95% CI)a P
≥1 AE 32 (82.1) 39 (97.5) −15.4 (−30.7, −2.5) 0.024
Hearing loss 1 (2.6) 1 (2.5) 0.1 (−10.7, 11.1) 0.986
 Grade 1 1 (2.6) 1 (2.5)
Stomatitis 30 (76.9) 38 (95.0) −18.1 (−34.3, −3.1) 0.021
 Grade 1 11 (28.2) 15 (37.5)
 Grade 2 10 (25.6) 13 (32.5)
 Grade 3 9 (23.1) 10 (25.0)
Pneumonitis 2 (5.1) 9 (22.5) −17.4 (−33.4, −2.3) 0.027
 Grade 1 1 (2.6) 2 (5.0)
 Grade 2 1 (2.6) 5 (12.5)
 Grade 3 0 1 (2.5)
 Grade 4 0 1 (2.5)
Hyperglycemia 11 (28.2) 11 (27.5) 0.7 (−19.1, 20.6) 0.945
 Grade 1 3 (7.7) 3 (7.5)
 Grade 2 4 (10.3) 5 (12.5)
 Grade 3 4 (10.3) 3 (7.5)

R/D/E, ridaforolimus 10 mg qd × 5/week, dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg/week, and exemestane 25 mg/day; R/E, ridaforolimus 30 mg qd 5 ×/week and exemestane 25 mg/day

Only the highest reported grade of a given adverse event is counted for an individual subject

AE adverse event, CI confidence interval

a

Based on Miettinen and Nurminen method