Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;34(12):2625–2637. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0642-4

Table 2.

Summary of amenamevir plasma pharmacokinetics after a single dose

Study Amenamevir dose (mg) No. AUCinf (ng h/mL) C max (ng/mL) t max (h)a t ½ (h) CL/F (L/h)
15L-CL-001 5 6 474 ± 113 42.9 ± 3.99 1.75 (1.00–3.00) 7.75 ± 1.58 11.1 ± 2.88
25 6 1980 ± 303 177 ± 21.9 2.50 (1.00–4.00) 7.42 ± 0.59 12.9 ± 2.04
100 6 5870 ± 1670 526 ± 76.9 2.00 (1.00–3.00) 7.09 ± 1.40 18.4 ± 5.71
300 6 11,700 ± 1920 1040 ± 264 3.00 (2.00–4.00) 6.88 ± 0.56 26.2 ± 4.49
600 6 18,700 ± 2960 1680 ± 218 3.00 (2.00–4.00) 6.86 ± 0.62 32.7 ± 4.78
Dose proportionalityb 0.766 (0.718–0.814) 0.759 (0.720–0.799)
15-CL-002 part 1 Dose proportionalityb 0.750 (0.714–0.785) 0.773 (0.740–0.806)
15-CL-002 part 2 300 (fasting) 8 11,200 ± 3420 937 ± 389 2.00 (1.5–5.0) 8.20 ± 1.79 29.2 ± 9.8
300 (fed) 8 20,700 ± 4130 1580 ± 257 5.00 (3.0–5.0) 8.45 ± 1.25 15.0 ± 2.8
GMRc 1.90 (1.55–2.32) 1.82 (1.34–2.48)

All values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise stated

AUC inf area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity, CL/F apparent oral clearance, C max peak drug concentration, GMR geometric least squares mean ratio (fed/fasting), t ½ terminal half-life, t max time to peak drug concentration

aThe median is presented (with the range in parentheses)

bPower model assessment of dose proportionality. The values presented are the slope (with the 95% confidence interval in parentheses)

cFor the fed/fasting condition (with the 90% confidence interval in parentheses)