Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;17(15):1–167.

Table 11:

Cost–Utility Analysis of Individual or Group CBT Delivered by Different Providers Versus Usual Carea

Strategy Mean Costs, $ (95% CrI) Mean QALYs (95% CrI) Incremental Costsb, $ (95% CrI) Incremental QALYsc (95% CrI) ICER: Strategy vs. Usual Care, $/QALY gained
Usual care 16,157.79
(9,936; 24,254)
3.460
(2.56; 4.29)
Group CBT by nonphysician 16,558.54
(10,789; 24,079)
3.568
(2.74; 4.33)
400.75
(−1,177; 1,665)
0.1079
(0.03;0.22)
3,715
Group CBT by physician 17,962.64
(12,112; 25,316)
3.568
(2.74; 4.33)
1,804.85
(65; 3,516)
0.1079
(0.03;0.22)
16,729
Individual CBT by nonphysician 19,325.80
(13,669; 26,697)
3.582
(2.76; 4.34)
3,168.00
(889; 5,624)
0.1222
(0.03; 0.25)
25,914
Individual CBT by physician 21,468.77
(15,223; 29,621)
3.582
(2.76; 4.34)
5,310.98
(2,539;8,938)
0.1222
(0.03; 0.25)
43,443

Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; CrI, credible interval; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year.

a

All costs in 2017 Canadian dollars. All costs and effects were discounted at 1.5%.

b

Incremental cost = average cost (strategy CBT) – average cost (strategy usual care).

c

Incremental effect = average effect (strategy CBT) – average effect (strategy usual care). Note: Results may appear incorrect because of rounding.