Table 25:

Results of Budget Impact Analysis: Other CBT Strategies Versus Usual Care

	Total Budget Impact, $
Strategy, Base Case Analysis	2017a	2018	2019	2020	2021a
Group CBT by physicians	109,433,424	325,237,147	649,846,395	1,085,291,631	1,634,490,392
Usual care	89,179,996	273,583,663	556,764,637	942,415,374	1,435,296,382
Net Budget Impact,b $	20,253,428	51,653,484	93,081,758	142,876,257	199,194,010
Individual CBT by nonphysicians	117,579,310	350,862,865	701,909,623	1,172,443,595	1,764,326,970
Usual care	89,179,996	273,583,663	556,764,637	942,415,374	1,435,296,382
Net Budget Impact, $	28,399,314	77,279,202	145,144,985	230,028,221	329,030,588
Individual CBT by physicians	130,938,018	390,903,806	782,042,830	1,305,968,464	1,964,160,363
Usual care	89,179,996	273,583,663	556,764,637	942,415,374	1,435,296,382
Net Budget Impact, $	41,758,022	117,320,143	225,278,193	363,553,090	528,863,981

Abbreviation: CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy.

^aIn 2017, uptake is assumed to be 20%; in 2021, it is assumed to be 100%.

^bNet budget impact = budget impact for a CBT strategy − budget impact for usual care.