Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 22;57(11):575–583. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2017-0057

Table 6.

Rate of favorable outcome according to treatment and clinical grade on admission

Study Clipping Coiling Conservative



Good-grade Poor-grade Good-grade Poor-grade Good-grade Poor-grade
Hamada et al., 199913) 8/10 0
Hamada et al., 200114) 3/15 0 1/14 0
Mont’alverne et al., 200517)
Nieuwkamp et al., 20064) 8/32 0/2 2/12 1/1 14/64 0/57
Asano et al., 200715) 2/4 0/1 0 0/1 0/6 0/12
Horiuchi et al., 201111) 147/217 23/116
Asano et al., 201116) 1/7 0/3 0/4 0/2 0/8 0/4
Scholler et al., 20135)
Hishikawa et al., 201418) 0/8 0/4
Sadamasa et al., 201419) 6/11 0/12 10/15 1/5 1/11 0/15
Wilson et al., 201420)
Shimamura et al., 201621) 17/38 0/7 7/15 0/5 3/13 0/6
Total 192 / 334 (57.5%) 23/141 (16.3%) 19/54 (35.2%) 2/18 (11.1%) 19/116 (16.4%) 0/94 (0%)
45 / 117* (38.5%) 0/25* (0%)

Numerator means applicable cases and denominator means total number of cases in each study.

*

The number was expressed by excluding the report by Horiuchi et al.