Table 7.

Average (standard deviation) across 50 replicates for selection intensity, proportion of male (M) and female (F) candidates selected, and accuracy for the evaluated scenarios

Scenario	Intensity	Proportion F	Proportion M	Accuracy
${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}}$	− 1.53 (0.10)	0.15 (0.02)	0.64 (0.13)
${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{tRFI}}$	− 1.52 (0.09)	0.15 (0.02)	0.66 (0.13)	0.56 (0.08)
${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{RFI}}$	− 1.53 (0.09)	0.15 (0.02)	0.61 (0.13)	0.61 (0.05)
${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}/\text{MW}}$	− 1.50 (0.1)	0.15 (0.02)	0.72 (0.12)	0.47 (0.09)
${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}/\text{WG}}$	− 1.49 (0.1)	0.15 (0.02)	0.72 (0.14)	0.53 (0.05)
${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}/\text{FG}}$	− 1.52 (0.09)	0.15 (0.02)	0.65 (0.14)	0.44 (0.09)

${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{RFI}}$ = selection against the consumption of feed beyond individual needs defined by the overall needs; ${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}/\text{MW}}$, ${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}/\text{WG}}$, ${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}/\text{FG}}$ = selection to reduce the amount of feed consumed for maintenance, growth and fat deposition, respectively

${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{FI}}$ = selection against feed intake; ${\widehat{\mathbf{I}}}_{\text{tRFI}}$ = selection for reduced traditional $\text{RFI}$