Table 5.
Results of the log linear analysis to test for differences in responses by parental sex, country, age of child, and household income
| G2 | X2 | df | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Parental sex | ||||
| (D, P, S) | 235.9 | 213.1 | 16 | <0.001 |
| (D, PS) | 235.7 | 212.8 | 15 | <0.001 |
| (P, DS) | 226.4 | 205.4 | 11 | <0.001 |
| (S, DP) | 16.4 | 17.0 | 11 | 0.126 |
| (DP, DS) | 6.86 | 6.92 | 6 | 0.334 |
| (DP, PS) | 16.2 | 16.7 | 10 | 0.093 |
| (DS, PS) | 226.2 | 205.0 | 10 | <0.001 |
| (DP, DS, PS) | 6.59 | 6.70 | 5 | 0.253 |
| (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Model 2: Country | ||||
| (D, P, C) | 228.7 | 209.4 | 16 | <0.001 |
| (D, PC) | 228.7 | 209.4 | 15 | <0.001 |
| (P, DC) | 225.3 | 205.2 | 11 | <0.001 |
| (C, DP) | 9.22 | 9.22 | 11 | 0.601 |
| (DP, DC) | 5.80 | 5.82 | 6 | 0.446 |
| (DP, PC) | 9.17 | 9.17 | 10 | 0.516 |
| (DC, PC) | 225.3 | 205.2 | 10 | <0.001 |
| (DP, DC, PC) | 5.79 | 5.81 | 5 | 0.327 |
| (DPC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Model 3: Age of child | ||||
| (D, P, A) | 228.7 | 208.3 | 16 | <0.001 |
| (D, PA) | 228.7 | 208.3 | 15 | <0.001 |
| (P, DA) | 222.5 | 201.5 | 11 | <0.001 |
| (A, DP) | 9.20 | 9.12 | 11 | 0.604 |
| (DP, DA) | 2.95 | 2.93 | 6 | 0.815 |
| (DP, PA) | 9.19 | 9.12 | 10 | 0.514 |
| (DA, PA) | 222.5 | 201.5 | 10 | <0.001 |
| (DP, DA, PA) | 2.81 | 2.78 | 5 | 0.729 |
| (DPA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Model 4: Household income | ||||
| (D, P, I) | 233.7 | 209.7 | 16 | <0.001 |
| (D, PI) | 233.6 | 209.4 | 15 | <0.001 |
| (P, DI) | 224.9 | 203.3 | 11 | <0.001 |
| (I, DP) | 17.5 | 17.5 | 11 | 0.093 |
| (DP, DI) | 8.75 | 8.70 | 6 | 0.188 |
| (DP, PI) | 17.5 | 17.5 | 10 | 0.065 |
| (DI, PI) | 224.8 | 203.2 | 10 | <0.001 |
| (DP, DI, PI) | 8.74 | 8.69 | 5 | 0.120 |
| (DPI) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
D Dimension (6 categories), P Parenting behavior (Encourage/Discourage), S Parental sex (M/F), C Country (USA/Canada), A Age of child (5-8/9-12), I Household income (below median/above median). XY represents two-way interactions; XYZ represents three-way interactions