Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 19;143(10):975–982. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1182

Table 2. Cochlear Implant (CI)-Related Characteristics of Focus Group Participants.

Group 1
(n = 4)
Group 2
(n = 9)
Group 3
(n = 10)
Total
(N = 23)
Best aided consonant–vowel nucleus–consonant word scores, %
Mean (SD) 20.5 (13.9) 58.4 (5.3) 77.6 (10.4) 61.0 (22.9)
Range 0-30 48-66 68-96 0-96
Listening modality, No. (%)
Unilateral CI (not bimodal) 2 (50) 1 (11) 0 3 (13)
Bimodala 1 (25) 3 (33) 2 (20) 6 (26)
Bilateral CI 1 (25) 5 (56) 8 (80) 14 (61)
Electroacoustic listeningb 0 0 2 (20) 2 (9)
Device manufacturer, No. (%)
Advanced Bionics 1 (25) 4 (44) 3 (30) 8 (35)
Cochlear 2 (50) 3 (33) 5 (50) 10 (43)
MED-EL 1 (25) 2 (22) 2 (20) 5 (22)
Duration of CI use, mean (SD), y 7.7 (5.2) 4.8 (4.1) 4.6 (1.9) 5.2 (3.4)
Age at CI surgery, mean (SD), y 56.9 (7.6) 63.9 (10.4) 64.1 (12.5) 62.8 (11.1)
Visual analog scale quality of life score, mean (SD)c 7.8 (2.5) 9.6 (0.8) 9.4 (0.9) 9.2 (1.3)
Time until data saturation reached during focus group, min 65 97 77 NA

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

Refers to use of a CI in one ear and a hearing aid in the other ear.

b

Refers to participants with preserved low-frequency hearing after cochlear implantation who use a combined hearing aid and CI device in the same ear; these individuals can be counted in more than 1 category, leading to count totals greater than 23.

c

On a scale of 1 to 10.