Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;15(3):164–181. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4688

Figure 2.

Figure 2

IsoCal results for three independent calibrations in a row for five linacs: the lateral (X) and longitudinal (Y) offsets in a full gantry rotation between the MV ((a) to (c)) and kV imager centers ((b) and (d)) (the origin) and the projected treatment isocenter. X1 X2, Y1 and Y2 are the points in each direction with the extreme values in that direction as illustrated in (b) (first curve); these extreme values were used as a metric of IsoCal reproducibility, as presented in Table 1. (a) and (b) are the results for linac M1, in (c) and (d): M1, Green, M2: Orange; M3: Red; M4: Black; M5: Blue.

Table 1.
Maximum differences (δX1, δX2, δY1, δY2) in extreme values (mm) for MV and kV panel corrections in each direction for the three IsoCal determinations for the five linacs. Figure 2 shows the full data for M1 and the definitions of X1, X2, Y1, δY2. All corrections are given in the plane of the isocenter
MV kV
δX1
δX2
δY1
δY2
δX1
δX2
δY1
δY2
M1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
M2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
M3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
M4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 ‐0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
M5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1