Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 8;15(5):100–111. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4851

Table 2.

PTV coverage differences between CT‐based and MRI‐based dose calculations. Negative differences signify smaller volumes on MRI. Note: Plans for Patients 1 and 3 did not include PTV59

MRI(W)
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7
PTV59 (V100%) 5.3% 3.5% 2.7% 3.7% 5.8%
PTV59 (V93%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 2.2%
0.1%
PTV63 (V100%) 1.7% 3.6% 9.9% 8.3% 2.3% 6.5% 9.8%
PTV63 (V93%) 0.3% 0.2% 1.2% 1.7% 0.7% 1.7% 0.4%
PTV70 (V100%) 12.0% 18.2% 65.0% 12.9% 6.5% 14.0% 65.5%
PTV70 (V93%) 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.8% 0.9% 0.1%
MRI(W+B)
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7
PTV59 (V100%) 1.0%
1.8%
1.7% 1.8% 1.6%
PTV59 (V93%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 1.6% 0.2%
PTV63 (V100%)
0.1%
0.7% 2.2% 1.4% 1.0% 2.4% 1.9%
PTV63 (V93%)
0.0%
0.1% 0.7% 1.3% 0.4% 1.0% 0.2%
PTV70 (V100%)
0.2%
0.9% 5.7% 0.4% 2.5% 2.2% 2.6%
PTV70 (V93%)
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0% 0.6% 0.5% 0.0%
MRI(W+B+A)
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7
PTV59 (V100%) 1.6%
0.1%
0.3% 2.6% 1.7%
PTV59 (V93%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6%
0.1%
PTV63 (V100%) 0.3%
0.3%
2.9% 2.0% 0.8% 2.0% 2.6%
PTV63 (V93%) 0.1%
0.4%
0.9% 0.0%
0.1%
1.3% 0.3%
PTV70 (V100%) 1.5% 1.7% 7.4% 3.5% 4.1% 3.7% 2.6%
PTV70 (V93%)
0.1%
0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.3% 0.0%