Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2017 Jun 25;30(8):1284–1304. doi: 10.1177/0898264317715184

Table 3.

Model-Estimated HRs and 95% CIs for Diagnostic Resolution by PN Versus Usual Care by Age Group.

Older adult participants ≥65 years Younger participants <65 years


Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted




Interval
(months)
Estimated HR
(95% CI)
p Estimated HR
(95% CI)
p Estimated HR
(95% CI)
p Estimated HR
(95% CI)
p
3 1.43 [0.90, 2.26] .1257 1.19 [0.75, 1.88] .4591 1.20 [0.88, 1.62] .2444 1.17 [0.94, 1.46] .1702
6 2.27 [1.39, 3.71] .0010 1.88 [1.17, 3.01] .0089 1.38 [1.01, 1.88] .0461 1.36 [1.07, 1.73] .0122
9 2.96 [1.63, 5.37] .0004 2.43 [1.35, 4.40] .0032 1.49 [1.06, 2.09] .0209 1.48 [1.13, 1.95] .0049
12 3.61 [1.80, 7.25] .0003 2.96 [1.46, 6.01] .0027 1.58 [1.10, 2.28] .0135 1.58 [1.16, 2.15] .0034

Note. The data shown are categorized as unadjusted (n = 862) and adjusted (n = 797) for race (White, Black, Other), marital status (single, married, divorced/widowed), education (less than high school, high school, some college/associate’s degree, college graduate/graduate degree), housing status (rent, own, live with family/friends/other), and income (less than $10K, $10K–$29,999, $30K–$49,999, $50K+). HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; PN = patient navigation.