Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 26;471(6):721–729. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2162-7

Table 3.

Types of genotyping errors reported in KRAS testing

EQA year
and Run
Number of laboratories reporting genotyping errors (%) Total number of errors reported False positive results reported False negative results reported Incorrect mutation reported aExtra mutation reported (not present)
2009 1 (5.5) 1 0 1 0 0
2010 2 (4.9) 5 1 2 2 0
2011–2012
Run 1
5 (9.8) 8 0 7 1 0
2011–2012
Run 2
2 (4.2) 8 1 1 6 0
2011–2012
Run 3
5 (9.6) 5 0 3 2 0
2012–2013
Run 1
3 (5.2) 4 2 2 0 0
2012–2013
Run 2
1 (1.5) 1 1 0 0 0
2012–2013
Run 3
2 (3.0) 2 0 2 0 0
2013–2014
Run 1
2 (3.4) 3 1 2 0 0
2013–2014
Run 2
2 (3.3) 2 0 2 0 0
2013–2014
Run 3
4 (6.3) 4 0 2 2 0
2014–2015
Run 1
9 (10.7) 15 8 6 1 0
2014–2015
Run 2
14 (16.7) 16 2 12 1 1
2015–2016
Run 1
13 (13.1) 25 8 11 6 0
2015–2016
Run 2
7 (6.5) 11 8 1 0 2

aExtra mutations differed to a false positive result, as these mutations were detected in addition to the mutation actually present in the sample, rather than being detected in a wildtype sample, which was classed as a false positive result