Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 22;23(23):7199–7208. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1178

Figure 4. FDG-PET/CT scan response.

Figure 4

(A) Percentage change in target lesion of standardized uptake value (SUV) of FDG from baseline in patients with either not objective response or objective response by RECIST 1.1. (B) Representative pictures of PET/CT scan in two patients with objective response.