Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;8:2355. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02355

Table 1.

Comparison of molecular typing between osteomyelitis (OM) and non-OM groups.

OM (n = 60) Non-OM (n = 79) p-value
MRSA, n (%) 9 (15.0) 19 (24.1) 0.19
SCCmec type of MRSA
    Type I, n (%) 2 (3.3) 12 (15.2) 0.11
    Type IV, n (%) 7 (11.7) 6 (7.6) 0.060
    Type V, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (1.3) 0.68
MLST
    Predominant type (n, %) ST188 (11,18.3), ST59 (9, 15.0) ST188 (15,19.0), ST59 (13, 16.5) 0.92, 0.82
    New type (n) ST3538 (1) ST3539 (1)
spa typing
    Predominant type (n, %) t189 (10,16.7), t437 (8, 13.3) t189 (14, 17.7), t437 (12, 15.2) 0.87, 0.76
    New type (n) t16342 (1), t16519 (1), and t16520 (1) t16521 (1)
agr grouping (n, %)
    Predominant group agr I (38, 63.3) agr I (62, 78.5) 0.049
    agr III/IV 18 (30.0) 8 (10.1) 0.0029
Predominant clone (n, %) ST188-t189-agr I (10, 16.7) ST188-t189-agr I (13, 16.5) 0.97
ST59-t437-agr I (8,13.3) ST59-t437-agr I (11, 13.9) 0.92

Significant differences are in boldface.