Table 3.
Risk of drink-driving among Chinese male drivers aged ≥18 years who consumed alcohol in the past 30 days, China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Survey, 2010 (unweighted N = 6,046).a
Crude PR | 95% CI | Adjusted PRb | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) (18–24 Ref) | ||||
25–34 | 1.1 | (0.9–1.5) | 1.0 | (0.7–1.4) |
35–54 | 1.2 | (0.9–1.6) | 0.9 | (0.6–1.5) |
≥ 55 | 1.0 | (0.7–1.4) | 0.8 | (0.5–1.2) |
Education | ||||
Some high school or less | Ref | |||
HS or some college | 1.1 | (1.0–1.3) | 1.2 | (1.1–1.4) |
College graduate and above | 1.1 | (0.9–1.4) | 1.3 | (1.1–1.7) |
Marital status | ||||
Single | Ref | |||
Married/cohabiting | 1.6 | (1.2–2.0) | 1.6 | (1.0–2.4) |
Separated/divorced/widowed | 1.7 | (1.1–2.7) | 1.6 | (1.0–2.8) |
Income (RMB, in quartiles) | ||||
Don’t know/not sure/refused | 0.7 | (0.6–1.0) | 0.7 | (0.5–1.0) |
Q1 (0–12,000) | 1.1 | (0.9–1.4) | 1.0 | (0.8–1.3) |
Q2 (12,500–24,000) | 1.0 | (0.9–1.2) | 1.0 | (0.8–1.1) |
Q3 (24,500–42,000) | Ref | |||
Q4 (43,000–1,200,000) | 1.0 | (0.8–1.2) | 1.0 | (0.8–1.2) |
Race | ||||
Minority | 1.3 | (0.9–1.7) | 1.1 | (0.8–1.5) |
Han nationality | Ref | |||
Tobacco use status | ||||
Current smoker | 1.3 | (1.1–1.5) | 1.2 | (1.1–1.4) |
Ex-smoker | 1.2 | (1.0–1.6) | 1.1 | (0.9–1.4) |
Never smoker | Ref | |||
Employed | ||||
Yes | 1.2 | (0.7–1.8) | 1.0 | (0.7–1.6) |
No | Ref | |||
Frequent drinking | ||||
Yes | 1.6 | (1.4–1.9) | 1.2 | (1.0–1.4) |
No | Ref | |||
Excessive drinking | ||||
Yes | 2.0 | (1.7–2.2) | 1.6 | (1.4–1.9) |
No | Ref | |||
Binge drinking | ||||
Yes | 1.9 | (1.6–2.3) | 1.5 | (1.2–1.8) |
No | Ref | |||
Seat belt use when driving | ||||
Usually | Ref | |||
Sometimes | 1.2 | (0.9–1.6) | 1.1 | (0.9–1.5) |
Rarely | 2.0 | (1.6–2.4) | 1.9 | (1.5–2.3) |
Never | 1.7 | (1.4–2.1) | 1.7 | (1.3–2.1) |
Driving license | ||||
Yes | Ref | |||
No | 1.1 | (0.9–1.4) | 1.1 | (0.8–1.3) |
Injury in past 12 mnths | ||||
Yes, traffic injury | 1.5 | (1.1–2.1) | 1.6 | (1.2–2.2) |
Yes, non-traffic injury | 1.6 | (12–22) | 1.4 | (1.0–1.9) |
No | Ref |
N is reduced in the multivariate analysis because of missing data for some covariates.
Each prevalence ratio is adjusted for all other variables in its respective column. Statistically significant adjusted prevalence ratios are in bold type. *HS = high school.