Table 1.
Origin and overall performance of molecular markers tested in genetic mapping of the new chokecherry map “Cho”.
| Marker type | Source species | Tested | Amplified | Polymorphic | Qualifiedc | Mapped | Mappedd(%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR | Peach | 176 | 130 | 116 | 85 | 54 | 30.7 | Dettori et al., 2015 |
| Peach | 48 | 27 | 19 | 17 | 11 | 22.9 | Present study | |
| Pear | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.1 | Zhang et al., 2014 | |
| LTR | Chokecherry | 336 | 283 | 78 | 59 | 20 | 6.0 | Liang et al., 2016 |
| Pear | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | Sun et al., 2015 | |
| SSR | Prunusa | 257 | 257 | 257 | 257 | 251 | 97.7 | Wang et al., 2014 |
| AFLP | Chokecherryb | 241 | 241 | 241 | 241 | 228 | 94.6 | Wang et al., 2014 |
| Total | 1077 | 942 | 712 | 660 | 565 | 52.5 |
a
Prunus SSR markers originate from chokecherry, peach, sweet cherry, wild cherry, Japanese plum, apricot, almond, and sour cherry.
b
Chokecherry AFLP markers are described in more detail in Wang et al. (2014).
c
Markers were considered qualified if segregation distortion ratios did not exceed χ's test at (p < 0.001).
d
Percentage of markers that were mapped of the total markers tested.