Table 2.
Results obtained when evaluating the performance of the presented methodology using different motions (W: walking, R: running; J: jumping; and H: hopping) and data sizes.
Motion Type | Frames | Segments | Framerate | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | 500 | 56 | 65 fps | 0.025 s |
W | 1000 | 119 | 62 fps | 0.039 s |
W | 2000 | 254 | 57 fps | 0.073 s |
W | 4000 | 498 | 49 fps | 0.124 s |
W-R | 5000 | 663 | 38 fps | 0.292 s |
W-R-J-H | 10000 | 1387 | 12 fps | 0.758 s |