Table 2.
Platforms for BBB modeling | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
transwell model | • replicates confluent monolayer • suitable for basic co-culture • easy measurement of TEER and permeability • does not require pumps or microfabrication |
• lacks shear stress • lacks cylindrical geometry • lacks proper heterotypic cell-cell contacts |
many compiled in [95, 96] |
membrane-based microfluidic models | • replicates shear stress • 2D plane allows for convenient imaging |
• lacks cylindrical geometry and ECM | [112–114] |
matrix-containing microfluidic models | • replicates shear stress • replicates a 3D environment for embedded cells • allows for some dynamic reorganization |
• matrix can pose technical challenges, including contraction • lacks cylindrical geometry |
[115] |
templated perfusable models | • replicates shear stress • replicates a 3D environment for embedded cells replicates cylindrical geometry |
• difficult to fabricate < 20–50 μm diameter vessels • cannot measure TEER |
[116, 120, 121] |