Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2347–2359. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants according to pregnancy status

Pregnant
Planning pregnancy
CGM (n=108)* Control (n=107) CGM (n=53) Control (n=57)
Age (years) 31·4 (4·5) 31·5 (4·9) 33·5 (3·5) 32·4 (3·6)
European origin 94 (87%) 90 (84%) 44 (83%) 51 (89%)
Gestational age (weeks) 10·5 (2·2) 11·0 (2·0) ·· ··
Primiparous 44/107 (41%) 40 (37%) ·· ··
Body-mass index (kg/m2) 26·1 (5·1) 25·3 (3·8) 26·4 (4·2) 26·6 (4·9)
Normal (<25 kg/m2) 53/107 (50%) 56 (52%) 23 (43%) 23 (40%)
Overweight (25–30 kg/m2) 33/107 (31%) 38 (36%) 23 (43%) 21 (37%)
Obese (≥30 kg/m2) 21/107 (20%) 13 (12%) 7 (13%) 12 (21%)
Duration of diabetes (years) 17·0 (6·0–28·0) 16·0 (6·6–26·4) 18·0 (6·2–30·0) 19·0 (9·0–28·0)
HbA1c at enrolment
Percentage 7·43 (0·70) 7·37 (0·77) 7·91 (0·69) 7·85 (0·67)
mmol/mol 58 (7·3) 57 (8·4) 63 (7·5) 62 (7·3)
HbA1c at randomisation§
Percentage 6·83 (0·67) 6·95 (0·66) 7·57% (0·77) 7·57 (0·58)
mmol/mol 51 (7·3) 52 (7·2) 59 (8·4) 59 (6·3)
Smoking 13/107 (12%) 23 (21%) 3 (6%) 6 (11%)
Post-secondary education 88 (81%) 77 (72%) 46 (87%) 47 (82%)
Pre-conception folic acid 54/107 (50%) 55 (51%) 29 (55%) 27 (47%)
Pre-conception multivitamin 35/107 (33%) 26 (24%) 18 (34%) 19 (33%)
Insulin pump 50 (46%) 48 (45%) 39 (74%) 42 (74%)
Automated insulin delivery option 19/103 (18%) 6/104 (6%) 6/52 (11%) 1 (2%)
Insulin injections 58 (54%) 59 (55%) 14 (26%) 15 (26%)
Total insulin dose (U/kg per day) 0·69 (0·25) 0·76 (0·31) 0·61 (0·19) 0·61 (0·16)
Diabetes complications|| 27 (25%) 30 (28%) 18 (34%) 23 (40%)
Retinopathy 22 29 16 19
Nephropathy 6 2 3 3
Neuropathy 3 4 2 4
Hypertension 4 (4%) 10 (9%) 11 (21%) 7 (12%)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 116·0 (14·0) 116·0 (13·6) 118·8 (13·8) 116·2 (12·0)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 69·1 (8·8) 70·0 (8·6) 73·7 (8·4) 71·7 (8·1)
Severe hypoglycaemia in past year** 13/107 (12%) 7 (7%) 3 (6%) 7 (12%)
Severe hypoglycaemia during early pregnancy (pre-randomisation) 7/107 (7%) 4 (4%) ·· ··
Hypoglycaemia awareness symptoms
Always aware 74/107 (69%) 76 (71%) 42 (79) 48 (84%)
Sometimes 30/107 (28%) 28 (26%) 10 (19%) 8 (14%)
Never aware 3/107 (3%) 3 (3%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)

Data are mean (SD), n (%), or n/N (%) where data are missing, except for duration of diabetes, which is median (tenth to 90th percentile). Data were collected at enrolment or randomisation (2 weeks after enrolment). CGM=continuous glucose monitoring. HbA1c= glycated haemoglobin.

*

One CGM participant withdrew immediately after randomisation and before baseline assessments, leaving 107 in both planning-pregnancy groups.

One underweight control participant (body-mass index <18·5 kg/m2) was planning pregnancy.

Locally assessed.

§

Centrally assessed. Randomisation HbA1c levels were unavailable for nine CGM participants (six lost or not collected, two withdrawals, and one pregnancy loss) and 11 control participants (nine lost or not collected, one withdrawal, and one pregnancy loss) in early pregnancy and for seven CGM participants (four lost or not collected, two withdrawals, and one pregnant) and five control participants (five lost or not collected) planning pregnancy. All participants had HbA1c levels (local lab) at enrolment.

25 pregnant participants and seven participants planning pregnancy used pumps with low glucose suspend features. Data regarding the use or frequency of insulin suspension is not available.

||

Diabetes complications are not mutually exclusive.

**

Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring third-party assistance.