Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 7;14(1):273–288. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4077

Table 4.

Beam profile analysis for TrueBeam, Clinac, and Trilogy linear accelerators.

Energy=6MV
10cm×10cm
Field Size
40cm×40mm
Field Size
Depth (cm) Linear Accelerator Penumbra (mm) Field Width (cm) Penumbra (mm) Field Width (cm)
TrueBeam#1 5.7 10.17 6.0 40.77
TrueBeam#2 5.6 10.18 5.9 40.78
1.5 TrueBeam#3 5.5 10.17 5.8 40.79
Clinac 2100 5.4 10.15 5.7 40.72
Trilogy 5.5 10.16 5.7 40.91
TrueBeam#1 7.2 11.03 10.1 44.14
TrueBeam#2 7.0 11.03 10.0 44.11
10 TrueBeam#3 7.0 11.05 9.9 44.19
Clinac 2100 6.8 11.02 10.0 44.16
Trilogy 6.8 11.03 10.1 44.29
Energy=15MV
10cm×10cm
Field Size
40cm×40mm
Field Size
Depth (cm) Linear Accelerator Penumbra (mm) Field Width (cm) Penumbra (mm) Field Width (cm)
TrueBeam#1 6.8 10.34 6.9 41.19
TrueBeam#2 6.8 10.34 7.3 41.13
2.8 TrueBeam#3 6.7 10.33 7.0 41.14
Clinac 2100 6.4 10.36 6.7 41.25
Trilogy 6.4 10.32 6.9 41.26
TrueBeam#1 7.8 11.06 8.9 44.08
TrueBeam#2 7.7 11.05 9.2 44.07
10 TrueBeam#3 7.6 11.07 8.8 44.19
Clinac 2100 7.5 11.08 8.6 44.26
Trilogy 7.3 11.04 8.8 44.21