Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 13;242(18):1820–1830. doi: 10.1177/1535370217731503

Table 2.

Echocardiographic analysis of mice in response to voluntary wheel running

NTG
Cyclin D2−/−
Sedentary (n = 4) Exercised (n = 4) Sedentary (n = 4) Exercised (n = 3)
Heart Rate (bpm) 486.0 ± 12.9 527.2 ± 16.4 484 ± 10.0 498.1 ± 14.0
LVIDd (mm) 3.93 ± 0.12 4.02 ± 0.02 3.51 ± 0.24 3.85 ± 0.06
LVIDs (mm) 2.69 ± 0.22 2.51 ± 0.06 2.31 ± 0.21 2.44 ± 0.08
LVPWd (mm) 0.65 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.04 0.58 ± 0.03
LVPWs (mm) 0.99 ± 0.01 1.15 ± 0.05* 0.91 ± 0.06 0.96 ± 0.01
LVAWd (mm) 0.65 ± 0.05 0.76 ± 0.02 0.64 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.02
LVAWs (mm) 1.02 ± 0.3 1.30 ± 0.06* 1.04 ± 0.11 1.06 ± 0.04
FS (%) 31.7 ± 3.9 37.6 ± 1.6 34.0 ± 4.8 36.6 ± 0.9
EF (%) 59.7 ± 5.6 68.0 ± 1.9 63.0 ± 6.2 67.0 ± 1.2

Note: Anesthetized mice underwent transthoracic echocardiography. Values are mean ± SEM.

LVIDd: LV internal diameter during diastole; LVIDs: LV internal diameter during systole; LVPWd: LV posterior wall thickness during diastole; LVPWs: LV posterior wall thickness during systole; LVAWd: LV anterior wall thickness during diastole; LVAWs: LV anterior wall thickness during systole; FS: fractional shortening; EF: ejection fraction.

*

P < 0.05 vs sedentary mice.