Table 6.
bioCADDIE official results: SIB Text Mining individual best score and relative rank, and aggregated participant’s best score stats
| Stats | infAP | infNDCG | P@10 (+partial) | NDCG@10 | P@10 (-partial) | UIR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIB Text Mining | rank | 1/10 | 5/10 | 5/10 | 3/10 | 2/10 | 2/10 |
| score | 0.3664 | 0.4258 | 0.7533 | 0.6271 | 0.3467 | 0.51 | |
| All participants | median | 0.2994 | 0.4250 | 0.7500 | 0.5806 | 0.3100 | 0.13 |
| min | 0.0876 | 0.3580 | 0.5333 | 0.4265 | 0.1600 | −1.00 | |
| 1st quartile | 0.2570 | 0.3954 | 0.7150 | 0.5546 | 0.2700 | −0.43 | |
| 3rd quartile | 0.3219 | 0.4433 | 0.7600 | 0.6234 | 0.3333 | 0.40 | |
| max | 0.3664 | 0.5132 | 0.8267 | 0.6861 | 0.4267 | 0.82 |
UIR: Unanimous Improvement Ratio.