Table 4.

Logistic regression of the likelihood of reducing working hours (by more than 4 h/w) on use of flexible work – only first child.

	Flexible work		Flexitime		Flexible place		Flexitime & Telework
	Coefficient	p-value	Coefficient	p-value	Coefficient	p-value	Coefficient	p-value
Constant	6.55	.116	7.35	.077	6.25	.129	7.97	.069
Main variables
No use of flexible work/time in either wave (ref)
Use flexible work/time in wave 4 only	−3.53	.022	–	–			–	–
Use flexible work/time in wave 2 only	.10	.926	−.07	.943			−.29	.792
Use flexible work/time in both waves	−1.60	.025	−2.09	.009			−2.44	.010
No use of telework in either wave (ref)
Use telework in wave 4 only					−1.75	.245	−1.17	.516
Use telework in wave 2 only					–	–	–	–
Use telework in both waves					−.34	.790	.70	.631
Pseudo R2	.33		.30		.27		.32

Source: Understanding Society waves 2–4.n = 117 for flexible work; 115 for flexitime as only two observations exist for flexitime in wave 4 only; 114 for telework as only three observation exists for telework in wave 2 only, 112 for flexible time and place. There are no women who work in a small part-time job in wave 1 in this sample. Same controls as Table 1 except for number of children. Detailed results are in Appendix 2, available online as a data supplement.