Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 5;6(11):1–11. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix095

Table 2:

Comparison analysis of genome sizes, assembly, and annotation of 4 palmae species, including coconut, Phoenix dacylifera (PDK30 and DPV01, 2 different versions), Elaeis guineensis (EG), and Elaeis oleifera (EO).

Sequencing Sequence Estimated Assembly Contig Scaffold Gene TEs,
Species technology coverage size, Gb size, Gb N50, Kb N50, Kb number %
Phoenix dactylifera (PDK30) Illumina GAIIx ×53.4 0.66 0.38 6.44 30.48 28 889 23.6
Phoenix dactylifera (DPV01) 454, SOLiD, ABI3730 ×139 0.67 0.56 10.81 334.08 41 660 38.87
Elaeis guineensis (African oil palm) 454 ×16 1.8 1.54 9.37 1045.41 34 802 43.24
Elaeis oleifera (American oil palm) 454 ×16 1.8 1.40 8.45 333.11
Cocos nucifera (Hai nan Tall) Illumina HiSeq ×173 2.42 2.20 72.64 418.07 28 039 72.75

Coconut: Cocos nucifera (Hainan Tall); PDK30: Phoenix dactylifera (PDK30); DPV01: Phoenix dactylifera (DPV01); EG: Elaeis guineensis (Africanoil palm E5 build); EO: Elaeis oleifera (American oil palm, O8-build). TE results were obtained using the same pipeline as for the coconut genome