Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 22;11(1):56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.10.011

Table 2.

Diagnostic Performance of ΔTHC 23.9% and ΔSIZE 42.6% in Predicting 61 Breast Cancers Lesions’ Response to NAC at Different Cycles

Parameters at Different Time Points Sen Spe PPV NPV Accuracy AUC (95% CI) P Value
ΔTHCmean (t1) 0.34 0.727 0.850 0.195 0.410 0.534(0.401-0.663) .6668
ΔTHCmean (t2) 0.48 0.727 0.889 0.235 0.525 0.604(0.470-0.727) .1893
ΔTHCmean (t3) 0.62 0.727 0.912 0.296 0.639 0.674(0.542-0.788) .0270
ΔTHCmean (tL) 0.70 0.727 0.921 0.348 0.705 0.714(0.584-0.822) .0059
ΔSIZEmean (t1) 0.08 0.909 0.800 0.179 0.230 0.505(0.374-0.636) .9121
ΔSIZEmean (t2) 0.38 0.909 0.950 0.244 0.475 0.645(0.512-0.763) .0115
ΔSIZEmean (t3) 0.62 0.818 0.939 0.321 0.656 0.719(0.589-0.827) .0018
ΔSIZEmean (tL) 0.86 0.455 0.878 0.417 0.787 0.657(0.525-0.774) .0567