Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 May 24;45(9):2135–2145. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1856-y

TABLE 3.

Summarizes details of ROC AUC per measure of balance (error count and instrumented test in double stance) and comparison of AUC.

Classification models AUC (95% CI) p valuea Sensitivity (%)b
Clinical mBESS 0.606 (0.503, 0.709) – 35
Double stance RMS ML 0.735 (0.637, 0.833) 0.042 63
Double stance RMS ML + double stance total power ML 0.750 (0.653, 0.847) 0.023 59

AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval.

a

Test of equality of AUC using the clinical mBESS model as the reference.

b

Sensitivity calculated for a specificity of 80%.