Table 2.

A summary of the repeated measures one‐way ANOVA Tukey post hoc test statistically significant differences comparing the absolute percent deviation in ${\mathrm{D}}_{95\mathrm{\%}},{\mathrm{D}}_{05\mathrm{\%}}$, and EUD caused by motion. The modality with the least susceptibility to motion (absolute percent changes in ${\mathrm{D}}_{95\mathrm{\%}},{\mathrm{D}}_{05\mathrm{\%}}$ or EUD closest to zero) is shown $(\mathrm{S}=\mathrm{S}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{S},\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{T}=\mathrm{H}\mathrm{T},\mathrm{N}=\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\hspace{0.17em}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y}\hspace{0.17em}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t})$, along with the mean difference in these values between the modalities (%) for each motion track group.

	Compensator vs.SNS (%)			Compensator vs.HT (%)			HT vs.SNS (%>)
Analysis	$D_{95\mathrm{\%}}$	$D_{05\mathrm{\%}}$	EUD	$D_{95\mathrm{\%}}$	$D_{05\mathrm{\%}}$	EUD	$D_{95\mathrm{\%}}$	$D_{05\mathrm{\%}}$	EUD
All	C 0.9	C 0.3	N	C 0.6	C 0.6	C 0.3	N	S 0.2	T 0.4
All SI	C 1.1	C 0.6	N	N	C 0.7	C 0.8	T 1.1	N	T 0.9
All AP	C 0.6	N	N	C 1.3	C 0.4	C 0.2	S 0.7	S 0.3	N
Amplitude All	C 1.0	C 0.3	N	C 0.8	C 0.7	N	N	S 0.4	T 0.3
Amplitude SI	C 1.1	C 0.7	N	N	C 0.9	C 0.5	T 1.1	N	T 0.7
Amplitude AP	C 0.8	N	N	C 1.6	C 0.5	C 0.2	S 0.8	S 0.5	N
Offset SI	C 1.0	C 0.5	N	N	C 0.5	C 1.2	T 1.2	N	T 1.2
Offset AP	C 0.4	C 0.3	N	C 1.0	C 0.3	N	S 0.5	N	N