Figure 6.

Percentage of P‐values model ((7), (8)) in comparison to FMCWS for all three simple implant geometries: (a), (b), and (c) represent data for case #1, #2, and #3, respectively. These typical data are shown for three values of Z (0, 1, and 3 cm). ${\mathrm{P}}_{\text{FMCWS}}$ represent the ${\mathrm{P}}_{1234}$ or ${\mathrm{P}}_{1234567}$. ${\mathrm{P}}_{\text{MODEL}}$ means ${\mathrm{P}}_1\times {\mathrm{P}}_2\times {\mathrm{P}}_3\times {\mathrm{P}}_4$ or ${\mathrm{P}}_1\times {\mathrm{P}}_2\times \dots {\mathrm{P}}_7$ and represent the multiplying of the P‐values from one active and inactive source. The $\mathrm{I}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}=1-\mathrm{P}-\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}$, and only graphically are shown for case #1. Maximum differences between FMCWS and MODEL are for $\mathrm{Z}=0\hspace{0.17em}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}$, especially in case #2 (5%). The statistic uncertainties are at most 1%.