Figure 7.

ISA‐ and P‐values percent model ((7), (8)) in comparison to FMCWS for all three ${\hspace{0.17em}}^{192}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{r}$ cases. These typical data are shown for $\mathrm{Z}=0,1$ and 3 cm. Figs. (a), (b), and (c) show ${\hspace{0.17em}}^{192}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{r}$ data for case #1, #2, and #3, respectively. ${\mathrm{P}}_{1234}$ or ${\mathrm{P}}_{1234567}$ represented FMCWS. ${\mathrm{P}}_1{\mathrm{P}}_2{\mathrm{P}}_3{\mathrm{P}}_4$ or ${\mathrm{P}}_1{\mathrm{P}}_2{\mathrm{P}}_3{\mathrm{P}}_4{\mathrm{P}}_5{\mathrm{P}}_6{\mathrm{P}}_7$ means ${\mathrm{P}}_1\times {\mathrm{P}}_2\times {\mathrm{P}}_3\times {\mathrm{P}}_4$ or ${\mathrm{P}}_1\times {\mathrm{P}}_2\times \&{\mathrm{P}}_7$ and represent ${\mathrm{P}}_{\text{MODEL}}$. The solid and dash lines are represent the ${\mathrm{P}}_{\text{FMCWS}}$ and ${\mathrm{P}}_{\text{MODEL}}$ values, respectively. The maximum differences between FMCWS and MODEL are at $\mathrm{Z}=0\hspace{0.17em}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}$, for case #2 (3.5%). The MC statistic uncertainties are at most 1.5%.