Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;19(9):1565–1574. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000379

Table 3.

Perceptions of family breakfast importance, positive interactions and structure among adolescents in rural Minnesota, USA, 2012–2014

Family breakfast frequency in the past week*
Never (n 437) 1–2 times (n 217) 3–7 times (n 173)
Mean se Mean se Mean se P value
Importance (range: 3–12) 6·1a,c 0·2 7·0b,c 0·2 7·8a,b 0·2 <0·001
Positive interactions (range: 3–12) 6·3a,b 0·2 7·5b 0·2 7·8a 0·2 <0·001
Structure (range: 2–8) 4·2a,b 0·1 4·8b 0·1 4·9a 0·1 <0·001

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

*

The model includes fixed effects for gender, school grade level, race, ethnicity, household structure, free/reduced-price school meal eligibility and household food security status, along with a random effect representing school.