Table 3.

Measurement‐guided dose reconstruction (3DVH) vs. TPS composite analysis passing rates overall (All), in the unit density central sphere (water) and lung. $2\%/2\text{mm}$ thresholds with local percent dose error normalization were used

	3DVH			TPS
	Composite Analysis Pass Rate $2\%/2\text{mm}(\%)$			Composite Analysis Pass Rate $2\%/2\text{mm}(\%)$
	All	Water	Lung	All	Water	Lung
2 cm	90	96	83	88	83	94
7 cm	68	83	50	88	96	78
H&N	88	96	78	76	87	61
Multi‐Target	98	96	100	98	100	94
C‐shape	78	91	61	32	30	33