Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 8;14(4):121–135. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218

Table 4.

Differences in OAR dosimetry compared to post‐stent plan

Metric (units) Post‐stent Average Value
±SD
IF Average Value
±SD
% IF Difference From Post‐stent VA Average Value
±SD
% VA Difference From Post‐stent DA Average Value
±SD
% DA Difference From Post‐stent
Lungs V5 (%)
64±20
60±20
6(p<.001)
a
60±21
6(p<0.001)
a
60±21
6(p<0.001)
a
V10 (%)
49±18
45±18
8(p<0.001)
a
45±18
8(p<0.001)
a
45±18
8(p<0.001)
a
V20 (%)
20±8
18±8
12(p=0.006)
a
17±8
13(p<0.001)
a
17±8
13(p=0.001)
a
V30 (%)
13±8
12±7
12(p=0.020)
a
11±7
15(p<0.001)
a
11±7
15(p=0.005)
a
Mean (Gy)
13±4
12±4
8(p=0.004)
a
12±4
9(p<0.001)
a
12±4
9(p=0.001)
a
Heart V40 (%)
51±23
45±23
10(p=0.004)
a
46±24
9(p=0.002)
a
46±24
9(p=0.003)
a
V30 (%)
72±18
70±17
3(p=0.147)
68±20
6(p=0.003)
a
68±20
5(p=0.018)
a
Liver Mean (Gy)
15±6
14±6
3(p=0.040)
a
15±6
2(p=0.006)
a
15±6
1(p=0.021)
a
V30 (%)
13±7
13±8
+3(p=0.514)
13±7
4(p=0.023)
a
13±7
3(p=0.032)
a
Kidneys V20 (%)
10±9
7±8
18(p=0.054)
9±9
1(p=0.196)
9±9
2(p=0.191)

Note: A negative difference value denotes a decrease, while a positive denotes an increase, with respect to the post‐stent average values.

a

=statistically significant; SD=standard deviation; IF=image fusion method; VA=volume approximation method; DA=diameter approximation method.