Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;14(5):79–89. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4283

Table 1.

Comparison of conformation indices between conventional zero margin (ZM) plans and negative margin technique (NMT) plans for all tested cases in the systematic group

Case
PTV(cm3)
%Px Isodose (ZM/NMT) AM SI (mm) ARC Angle (°) AM APRL (mm)
CI100(ZM)
CI100(NMT)
ΔCI100(%)
CI50(ZM)
CI50(NMT)
ΔCI50(%)
MCI100(ZM)
MCI100(NMT)
ΔICI100(%)
1 20.5 80/76
S&I+3
181–180 ‐1 1.27 1.16 ‐8.7 4.67 4.21 ‐9.9 0.72 0.78 8.2
2 52.3 76/75
S&I+2
181–260 NC 1.18 1.13 ‐4.2 4.54 4.40 ‐3.1 0.78 0.80 3.3
261–330 A‐2, P‐3
331–80 NC
81–150 A‐2, P‐3
151–180 NC
3 45.4 80/77
S&I+2
181–220 NC 1.34 1.19 ‐11.2 5.11 4.73 ‐7.4 0.68 0.77 13.5
221–316 A‐2, P‐5
317–46 NC
47–136 A‐2, P‐5
137–180 NC
4 30.8 72.5/77
S+3,I+4
181–180
A&R+3,P&L3
1.38 1.17 ‐15.2 5.35 5.21 ‐2.6 0.66 0.77 17.8
5 32.3 80/80
S&I+3
181–90 A‐l, R‐l 1.30 1.20 ‐7.7 4.81 4.49 ‐6.7 0.71 0.76 7.5
Mean ‐9.4 Mean ‐5.9 Mean 10.1
SD 4.1 SD 3.1 SD 5.7

%Px: = percent prescription; AM = aperture margin; S, I, A, P, R, and L = superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, right, and left directions (e.g., A‐2 indicates ‐2 mm margin in anterior direction); NC = no margin change; ACI = change of Cl from ZM to NMT in %=[CI(NMT)/CI(ZM)1]×100.