Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4):295–301. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170053

Table 2.

Comparison of the conventional semen parameters and cytochemical analyses between the groups.

Semen parameters Varicocele Logistic regression
Yes (n=391) No (n=2008) Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p
pH 8.1±0.4 8.0±0.4 1.4 1.03-1.82 0.02
Volume (ml) 2.5±1.1 2.8±1.6 0.90 0.82-0.99 0.02
Concentration(x106/ml) 44.4±45.5 76.4±57.2 0.98 0.97-0.99 <0.001
Progressive motility (%) 51.2±17.6 57.0±16.5 0.98 0.97-0.99 <0.001
Total motility (%) 59.1±17.2 63.7±16.0 0.98 0.97-0.99 <0.001
Normal forms (%) 0.4±0.9 0.9±1.5 0.70 0.61-0.81 <0.001
Vitality (%) 60.3±16.3 65.3±15.7 0.98 0.97-0.98 <0.001
Leukocytes (x106/ml) 0.4±1.4 0.7±0.8 1.06 0.96-1.16 0.22
DNA Fragmentation (%) 16.3±8.8  15.3±8.5  1.02 1.01-1.03 0.03
CMA3 positive (%) 58.9±14.8  55.6±15.2 1.02 1.01-1.03 0.001 
Abnormal MMP (%) 28.3±16.9  25.4±16.2 1.02 1.01-1.03 0.03
Apoptosis (%) 18.8±7.4 19.2±8.1 0.99 0.97-1.01 0.45