Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(1):79–89. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170498

Table 2.

Logistic regression models

Full Sample, including cognitively healthy and participants with MCI N=349 Subset of participants with MCI at baseline N=244
Predictor OR 95%CI P-value OR 95%CI P-value
IICV alone 2.39 (1.60, 3.56) <0.0001 2.77 (1.72, 4.46) <0.0001
Ratio of CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 alone 2.13 (1.52, 2.99) <0.0001 2.16 (1.49, 3.13) <0.0001
IICV and CSF analytes together - - - - - -
IICV 2.81 (1.83, 4.33) <0.0001 3.41 (2.03, 5.73) <0.0001
Ratio of CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 2.48 (1.72, 3.60) <0.0001 2.63 (1.73, 4.01) <0.0001

Notes:

Base Model included baseline age, baseline education, APOE e4 status and years of follow-up. For analyses including cognitively healthy participants and those with MCI, base model also includes baseline diagnostic status.

IICV was estimated using baseline data.

Abbreviations:

MCI: Mild Cognitive Impairment

IICV: Intra-individual cognitive variability

CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid

OR: Odd ratio

CI: Confidence Interval