Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Nat Prod. 2017 Aug 3;80(8):2252–2262. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00193

Table 4. Confidence Data for IR and VCD Spectra Comparisons for Compounds 1–4.

compound level of theory anHa SIRb SEc S−Ed ESIe C (%)f
1 mPW1B95/DGDZVP 0.960 91.9 72.5 9.6 62.9 99
B3PW91/DGDZVP 0.971 92.2 75.9 6.5 69.4 99
2 mPW1B95/DGDZVP 0.960 90.4 57.6 20.9 36.7 86
B3PW91/DGDZVP 0.971 93.3 72.2 4.9 67.3 99
3 mPW1B95/DGDZVP 0.974 90.4 72.4 3.9 68.5 99
B3PW91/DGDZVP 0.972 90.5 73.8 4.5 69.3 99
4 mPW1B95/DGDZVP 0.960 92.4 67.4 18.5 48.9 87
B3PW91/DGDZVP 0.976 91.8 80.1 6.8 73.3 99
1 exp vs 2 calc 0.971 90.2 65.6 9.1 56.5 93
2 exp vs 1 calc 0.970 92.3 49.8 19.9 29.9 69
a

Scaling frequencies factor.

b

IR spectral similarity.

c

VCD spectral similarity for the correct enantiomer.

d

VCD spectral similarity for the incorrect enantiomer.

e

Enantiomer similarity index calculated as SES−E.

f

Confidence level for the stereochemical assignment.