Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 14;13(4):429–442. doi: 10.1007/s11302-017-9571-6

Table 1.

Effects of cAMP analogues on TGF-β1-induced EMT

TGF-β1
8-CPT-cAMP N6-Ph-cAMP 8-CPT-2Me-cAMP IBMX
ZEB1 19.6 ± 2.5 8.4 ± 2.3* 10.1 ± 2.0* 16.6 ± 3.4 9.7 ± 2.9*
Slug 13.3 ± 1.9 4.1 ± 1.7* 6.1 ± 1.2* 14.4 ± 2.3 10.2 ± 3.1
Fibronectin 15.7 ± 2.8 4.5 ± 1.3* 5.3 ± 0.8* 12.1 ± 1.6 5.1 ± 0.9*
α-SMA 21.2 ± 5.4 6.3 ± 2.6* 9.5 ± 1.4* 8.9 ± 1.9* 15.8 ± 3.1
Vimentin 13.5 ± 1.8 4.8 ± 1.5* 5.6 ± 2.1* 6.1 ± 2.0* 6.3 ± 1.2*
N-cadherin 7.9 ± 1.5 2.4 ± 0.2* 2.1 ± 0.8* 2.6 ± 0.1* 5.8 ± 1.1
E-cadherin 0.56 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1* 1.2 ± 0.3* 1.1 ± 0.2* 0.93 ± 0.1*

MDCK cells were exposed to 5 ng/mL TGF-β1 for 48 h in the absence or presence of 5 μM 8-CPT-cAMP, 5 μM N6-Ph-cAMP, 5 μM 8-CPT-2Me-cAMP, or 100 μM IBMX. The expression of ZEB1, Slug, Fibronectin, α-SMA, Vimentin, N-cadherin, and E-cadherin was evaluated by RT-PCR analysis. Each value represents the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, and it is expressed as relative amount of mRNA normalized to GAPDH. Student’s t test: *P < 0.05 vs. TGF-β1-treated cells (control)